Practice 4.7 Sustainable Development with authentic IB Economics exam questions for both SL and HL students. This question bank mirrors Paper 1, 2, 3 structure, covering key topics like microeconomics, macroeconomics, and international trade. Get instant solutions, detailed explanations, and build exam confidence with questions in the style of IB examiners.
Over the past decade, Iceland’s economy has experienced both rapid growth and sudden declines. Tourism surged from fewer than 1 million visitors in 2012 to over 2 million visitors in 2019. However, fishing remains one of Iceland’s most significant export sectors, accounting for around 20% of national exports. The COVID-19 pandemic and associated travel restrictions led to a sharp decrease in tourism revenues and posed challenges for Iceland’s open economy.
Although Iceland has one of the lowest levels of income inequality among OECD countries, its policymakers remain vigilant about potential inequalities. Corporate and personal income taxes help fund a comprehensive social welfare system. Indirect taxes, such as a value-added tax (VAT) of 24%, also contribute significantly to government revenue. Recent exchange rate fluctuations have influenced the competitiveness of Icelandic fish products abroad.
Table 1: Real GDP in Iceland
| Year | Nominal GDP (ISK billions) | GDP Deflator (Base year 2017=100) |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2,600 | 100 |
| 2018 | 2,730 | 102 |
| 2019 | 2,800 | 105 |
| 2020 | 2,650 | 106 |
Table 2: Hypothetical Demand for Icelandic Cod Exports
| Price per kg (ISK) | Quantity Demanded (tonnes per month) |
|---|---|
| 800 | 15,000 |
| 840 | 14,200 |
Table 3: Income Distribution in Iceland (2020)
| Quintile | Share of National Income (%) |
|---|---|
| Lowest 20% | 10 |
| Second 20% | 14 |
| Third 20% | 19 |
| Fourth 20% | 24 |
| Highest 20% | 33 |
Figure 1 (not to scale) illustrates the growth in tourist arrivals in Iceland from 2017 to 2020:
• 2017: 2.2 million visitors
• 2018: 2.3 million visitors
• 2019: 2.0 million visitors
• 2020: 0.5 million visitors
Additionally, Iceland’s current corporate income tax rate is 20%. Personal income taxes range from 20% to 31%, depending on income brackets. VAT on goods such as tourism-related services is 11%, while it is 24% for most other goods. Policymakers in Iceland are debating how to sustain economic growth in the post-pandemic period by encouraging both a more diversified export sector and a stronger tourism industry.
Using the information provided in Table 1, calculate the real GDP for Iceland in 2020 (in ISK billions).
Suppose that an increase in government spending of ISK 30 billion led to an overall increase in real GDP of ISK 60 billion. Using the concept of the Keynesian multiplier, calculate the multiplier for Iceland.
Using the information from Table 2, calculate the price elasticity of demand (PED) when the price of cod increases from ISK 800 per kg to ISK 840 per kg.
If indirect tax revenue from VAT on various goods rises by ISK 8 billion as a result of higher consumption, calculate the total additional amount spent on these goods by consumers (assuming a uniform 24% VAT on those goods).
Define the term “income inequality.”
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how a significant decline in tourist arrivals (as shown in Figure 1) might affect Iceland’s real output and price level in the short run.
Using the income distribution data from Table 3, calculate the cumulative income share held by the bottom 60% of Icelandic households.
Using the information in the text and Table 3, explain two ways in which Iceland’s relatively low income inequality might support further economic development.
Using the text/data provided and knowledge of economics, recommend a policy that could be implemented by the Icelandic government in order to sustain economic growth while maintaining low inequality.
Nepal is a landlocked country in South Asia with a population of approximately 29.3 million people. Agriculture remains crucial, contributing about 27% of gross domestic product (GDP). Tourism and remittance inflows (estimated at around 24% of GDP) are also major components of Nepal’s economy. Nepal’s main trading partner is India, accounting for the largest share of both exports and imports. Nepal’s government applies a 13% Value Added Tax (VAT) on many goods and services, including coffee sales in the domestic market.
Table 1: Key Macroeconomic Indicators for Nepal (2019–2021)
| Year | Real GDP (billion NPR) | Real GDP growth (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 4000 | 7.0 |
| 2020 | 4160 | 4.0 |
| 2021 | 4290 | 3.5 |
Table 2: Labour Market Data for Nepal (2021)
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | 29,300,000 |
| Employed | 10,400,000 |
| Unemployed | 1,100,000 |
Table 3: Income Distribution (Nepal and Selected Countries)
| Country | Gini Coefficient | Proportion of Population below National Poverty Line (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Nepal | 0.33 | 18.7 |
| India | 0.35 | 21.9 |
| Bhutan | 0.38 | 8.2 |
Figure 1: Market for Nepali Coffee
Using the information from Table 1, calculate the average annual real GDP growth rate for Nepal over the period 2019–2021.
Using the data in Figure 1, and applying the midpoint method, calculate the price elasticity of demand for Nepali coffee when its price rises from 400 NPR/kg to 440 NPR/kg.
Using the information provided in Table 2, calculate the unemployment rate in Nepal for 2021.
From the information on VAT in the text above, calculate the total amount of VAT revenue the government collected from domestic coffee sales in 2022.
Define the term “Keynesian multiplier.”
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how a decrease in personal income tax could affect real GDP in Nepal.
A coffee shop in Nepal sells coffee worth 1,232,000 NPR in 2022. Given the 13% VAT mentioned in the case study, calculate the amount of VAT revenue included in this total.
Using information from Table 3, explain how income inequality could act as a barrier to economic development in Nepal.
Using the text/data provided and knowledge of economics, recommend one policy the government of Nepal could implement to reduce dependence on remittances and stimulate sustainable economic growth. Justify the recommendation.
Vietnam is one of the fastest-growing economies in Southeast Asia. Over the past two decades, it has transformed from a primarily agrarian society to a bustling hub for manufacturing and high-tech industries. Despite this rapid growth, Vietnam’s economy still depends heavily on primary commodities such as coffee and rice for foreign exchange earnings. Global coffee prices, fluctuations in supply, and shifts in consumer preferences affect Vietnam’s farmers and exporters significantly.
At the same time, Vietnam has made considerable progress in reducing poverty. Yet income inequality has been gradually rising, posing new challenges for policymakers. The government is also reviewing its tax policies and infrastructure expenditure. Part of the government’s long-term strategy includes upgrading road networks to facilitate trade and encouraging domestic firms to move into higher value-added segments.
Below are several tables presenting data on Vietnam’s coffee market, its macroeconomic performance, and its tax system.
Table 1: Vietnam’s Coffee Market
| Price (VND/kg) | Quantity Demanded (thousand tonnes/year) | Quantity Supplied (thousand tonnes/year) |
|---|---|---|
| 30,000 | 1,500 | 1,200 |
| 33,000 | 1,450 | 1,250 |
Table 2: Macroeconomic Indicators for Vietnam (2019–2022)
| Year | Real GDP (billions of US$, 2015 prices) | Population (millions) | Gini Coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 245 | 96 | 0.36 |
| 2020 | 252 | 97 | 0.37 |
| 2021 | 261 | 98 | 0.37 |
| 2022 | 275 | 99 | 0.38 |
Table 3: Vietnam’s Current Tax Rates
| Type of Tax | Rate |
|---|---|
| Corporate Income Tax | 20% |
| Personal Income Tax | Progressive up to 35% |
| Value-Added Tax (VAT) | Standard rate: 10% |
| (some goods at 5% or 0%) |
Recently, a domestic firm in Ho Chi Minh City purchased manufacturing equipment for 220,000 VND (the price paid, inclusive of VAT, at the standard 10% rate). Vietnam’s government has also announced major highway construction projects in the central and southern regions to improve the flow of goods and workers.
Meanwhile, economists note that an increase in the concentration of coffee exports in Vietnam’s revenue mix may expose the economy to volatility in global commodity prices. Measures to move into higher-value agricultural products, processing and branding, and improved farmer education are considered as long-term strategies to reduce reliance on primary commodities.
Using the information from Table 1, calculate the price elasticity of demand (PED) for coffee in Vietnam when the price increases from VND 30,000 per kg to VND 33,000 per kg. Show your working.
Using the data from the text and Table 3, calculate how much VAT (at the standard 10% rate) is contained in the purchase price of 220,000 VND for the manufacturing equipment. Show your working.
Using the data from Table 2, calculate Vietnam’s real GDP growth rate from 2021 to 2022. Show your working.
From Table 2, calculate the approximate real GDP per capita in 2022. Assume the population for 2022 is 99 million. Show your working.
Define the term “progressive tax.”
Explain why dependence on primary commodity exports (such as coffee) may pose challenges for a rapidly developing economy like Vietnam.
Using information from Table 2, calculate the percentage change in Vietnam's Gini coefficient between 2019 and 2022. Show your working.
With reference to the data in Table 2, explain how rising income inequality (as indicated by changes in the Gini coefficient) might affect Vietnam’s long-term economic growth.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend one policy that the government of Vietnam could implement to reduce its reliance on primary commodity exports (like coffee) while promoting sustainable economic development.
Ghana’s economy has experienced relatively high levels of economic growth over the past decade, largely driven by the export of primary commodities, such as cocoa and gold, and an expanding services sector. Ghana is one of the world’s largest exporters of cocoa, and cocoa alone contributes a significant share of the country’s export earnings. Despite these gains, Ghana has faced macroeconomic challenges in recent years, including rising inflation and fiscal deficits.
The government has attempted to diversify the economy away from its reliance on primary commodities, investing in infrastructure and seeking to encourage more value-added activities to boost productivity and employment. However, issues such as income inequality and limited access to finance in rural areas persist and may limit the potential for inclusive growth.
Below are some data tables about Ghana’s economy.
Table 1: Selected Macroeconomic Indicators for Ghana (2022)
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Nominal GDP (US$ billions) | 74 |
| Real GDP growth rate (%) | 3.7 |
| Inflation rate (%) (year-on-year, end of period) | 31 |
| Government expenditure (GH¢ billions) | 103 |
| Population (millions) | 31.4 |
| Gini coefficient | 0.43 |
Table 2: Cocoa Market Data (2022 estimates)
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Domestic demand for cocoa (tonnes) | 70 000 |
| Domestic cocoa price (GH¢ per tonne) | 10 000 |
| World cocoa price (GH¢ per tonne) | 11 000 |
| Quantity exported (tonnes) | 800 000 |
| Estimated price elasticity of demand (PED) | –0.5 |
| Estimated price elasticity of supply (PES) | +0.3 |
Table 3: Income Tax Rates in Ghana
| Tax Rate Bracket | Rate of Tax |
|---|---|
| 0 – GH¢ 3 828/year | 0 % |
| GH¢ 3 828 – GH¢ 20 000/year | 15 % |
| GH¢ 20 000 – GH¢ 40 000/year | 25 % |
| Above GH¢ 40 000/year | 30 % |
Additional information:
• The marginal propensity to consume (MPC) in Ghana is estimated at 0.8.
• Government tax revenue from cocoa exports is calculated as 10 % of the value of cocoa exported.
• The government aims to reduce inflation by tightening monetary policy and improving the efficiency of its tax collection system.
Using the information in Table 2, calculate the total tax revenue (in Ghana cedis) the government earns from cocoa exports.
Assume that the government injects an additional GH¢ 1 billion into infrastructure spending. Given that the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) in Ghana is 0.8, calculate the total change in real GDP resulting from this additional spending using the Keynesian multiplier formula.
Using the information in Table 1, calculate Ghana’s approximate GDP per capita in US dollars. Show your working.
From Table 2, using the estimated PES (+0.3), calculate the percentage change in quantity supplied of cocoa if its price rises from GH¢ 10 000 per tonne to GH¢ 11 000 per tonne in the domestic market.
Define the term “income inequality.”
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how tightening monetary policy could help reduce inflation in Ghana.
Using information from Table 2, calculate the total revenue (in GH¢) from domestic cocoa sales. Show your working.
With reference to the data in Table 1 and Table 3, explain two ways in which income tax policy could influence income distribution in Ghana.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend a policy that could be implemented by the government of Ghana to promote inclusive growth (i.e., reduce income inequality while sustaining economic growth). Justify your recommendation.
Indonesia’s Path to Economic Reform
Indonesia is undergoing a period of economic transformation, with ambitious reforms aimed at fostering long-term growth. The government has prioritized infrastructure expansion, streamlining regulations, and reducing corruption to attract investment. Additionally, tax incentives are being introduced to boost emerging industries such as transportation, telecommunications, metal production, and agricultural processing.
To fund infrastructure projects, which are projected to cost USD 22 billion, the government has reduced fuel subsidies, despite their role in making energy affordable for low-income households. While this move is expected to free up government funds, it has contributed to inflation, which has surged to 7.26%, exceeding the central bank’s target of 3–5%.
Indonesia’s economy also faces external challenges. Falling global prices of coal, gold, and palm oil, its major exports, have put downward pressure on export revenue. Meanwhile, economic growth has slowed, leading to declining consumer confidence. The Gini coefficient, which measures income inequality, has risen in recent years, reflecting concerns about income distribution.
To strengthen its economic foundation, the government is focusing on education and vocational training, aiming to reduce unemployment by upskilling its youthful workforce. Moreover, efforts to support small businesses include expanding access to micro-credit and making loans more accessible to entrepreneurs.
In response to economic pressures, Indonesia has also introduced trade protection measures, including tariffs and import restrictions, to shield domestic industries and encourage local production. However, critics argue that such policies may reduce efficiency and competitiveness in the long run.
Figure 1: Indonesian Development Statistics
| Year | Relative Poverty (% of population) | Absolute Poverty (millions) | Gini Coefficient | Human Development Index (HDI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 16.6 | 37 | 0.35 | -* |
| 2008 | 15.4 | 35 | 0.35 | 0.654 |
| 2009 | 14.2 | 33 | 0.37 | -* |
| 2010 | 13.3 | 31 | 0.38 | 0.671 |
| 2011 | 12.5 | 30 | 0.40 | 0.678 |
| 2012 | 11.7 | 29 | 0.41 | 0.681 |
| 2013 | 11.5 | 29 | 0.41 | 0.684 |
| 2014 | 11.0 | 28 | -* | -* |
Figure 2: Indonesia’s Economic Growth and Trade Statistics
| Year | GDP Growth (%) | Export Revenue (USD billion) | Trade Balance (USD billion) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 6.2 | 210 | 18.5 |
| 2011 | 6.5 | 230 | 15.2 |
| 2012 | 6.0 | 215 | 9.8 |
| 2013 | 5.8 | 200 | 3.4 |
| 2014 | 5.1 | 185 | -1.2 |
Define the term "inflation".
List two factors that may contribute to income inequality in an economy.
Using information from Figure 1, calculate the percentage decrease in absolute poverty between 2007 and 2014.
Draw a Lorenz curve diagram to illustrate the concept of income inequality in Indonesia.
Using a tariff diagram, explain how trade protection measures can support domestic industries.
Using an AD-AS diagram, explain how reducing fuel subsidies may affect Indonesia’s inflation rate.
Using a PPC diagram, explain how investment in education and vocational training can contribute to Indonesia’s long-term economic growth.
Using information from the text and your knowledge of economics, evaluate the Indonesia's current measures' effectiveness in achieving economic growth and development.
Austria is a landlocked country in Central Europe with a population of approximately 9 million. It has a high-income economy, diversified across manufacturing, services, and a thriving tourism sector. During 2022, tourism alone contributed about 15% of Austria’s gross domestic product (GDP), fueled by both winter sports and year-round cultural tourism.
Austria’s real GDP growth rate moderately improved between 2019 and 2022, assisted by strong consumer demand, increasing trade with neighboring economies (most notably Germany), and an expansionary fiscal stance. Government spending on infrastructure has grown, although policy makers closely watch any inflationary pressures that could arise from such fiscal expansion.
Despite relatively low inequality levels compared to many other developed nations, Austria’s Gini coefficient has inched upward from 0.26 a decade ago to around 0.28 in 2022. Debates on whether to reform personal income tax rates or strengthen social welfare programs have gained attention.
In terms of taxation, Austria uses a progressive personal income tax system with a top marginal rate of 55%. Corporate income taxes for resident firms currently stand at 25%, although there have been proposals to reduce this rate to 22%. To stimulate the economy further, the government allocated €5 billion in 2022 toward infrastructure projects, anticipating that the Keynesian multiplier would raise overall economic activity significantly.
Table 1 below shows simplified data on the Austrian ski package market, while Tables 2–4 provide additional macroeconomic and distribution information that will be referred to in the questions.
Table 1: The Market for Austrian Ski Packages (2021–2022)
| Year | Average Price per Package (EUR) | Quantity Demanded (millions) | Quantity Supplied (millions) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 900 | 4.0 | 3.8 |
| 2022 | 960 | 3.6 | 4.0 |
Table 2: Nominal GDP and Price Index in Austria (2019–2022)
| Year | Nominal GDP (billion EUR) | Price Index (2015=100) |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 390 | 104 |
| 2020 | 382 | 105 |
| 2021 | 400 | 106 |
| 2022 | 425 | 108 |
Table 3: Selected Economic Indicators (2022)
| Government Infrastructure Spending (billion EUR) | Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) | Proposed Corporate Tax Rate (%) | Current Personal Income Tax Rate (progressive, top rate) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 0.75 | 25 | 55% |
Table 4: Income Distribution Data in Austria (2022)
| Income Group | Average Annual Income (EUR) | Population Share (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Highest quintile (Q5) | 65,000 | 20 |
| Fourth quintile (Q4) | 50,000 | 20 |
| Third quintile (Q3) | 35,000 | 20 |
| Second quintile (Q2) | 25,000 | 20 |
| Lowest quintile (Q1) | 15,000 | 20 |
Using information from Table 1, calculate the price elasticity of demand (PED) for Austrian ski packages between 2021 and 2022.
Using the information in Table 3, calculate the total potential change in GDP if the government spends €5 billion on infrastructure and there is no crowding out.
Using data from Table 2, calculate Austria’s real GDP in 2022.
Using data from Table 1, calculate the price elasticity of supply (PES) for ski packages between 2021 and 2022.
Define the term “Keynesian multiplier.”
Explain why an economy that relies heavily on tourism might encounter risks to its macroeconomic stability.
Using information from Table 4, calculate the ratio of average annual income between the highest quintile (Q5) and lowest quintile (Q1). Show your working.
Using information from Table 4 (and the text above), explain how Austria’s relatively low Gini coefficient might influence its long-term economic growth and social outcomes.
Using the text/data provided and knowledge of economics, recommend one policy that the Austrian government could implement to diversify its economy beyond tourism while ensuring sustainable, long-term economic growth.
Inequality in China
As China’s economy first began to use market-oriented policies in the 1970s, it was famously suggested that some citizens, particularly through hard work, “should be allowed to get rich before others”. The government still plays a dominant role in the allocation of resources and benefits, keeping most of the gains for itself and its employees. Civil servants, who are assigned government housing, have benefited more and accumulated more wealth than the private sector employees.
Income inequality is a politically sensitive issue in China and the government has not reported on it for 26 years. In 1988, the Gini coefficient was 0.38 and the next set of figures released in 2014 give a value of 0.47.
According to research by the China Reform Foundation (CRF), “hidden income” amounts to more than US$1.4 trillion, or the equivalent of Australia’s annual gross domestic product (GDP). “Hidden incomes” refer to money gained from bribery or other corrupt behaviour, for example, bribes for officials or corrupt payments for doctors.
Low-income households are stuck with an outdated tax system that fails to address the inequality issue. They carry the burden of tax payments while the rich and powerful operate largely outside the tax system. Low-income households also have difficulty accessing credit.
Although the Chinese government expenditure is high, there tends to be inadequate spending on social protection programmes relating to health and old age. The lack of social protection has resulted in a high marginal propensity to save (MPS) amongst the low-income households as they put money away to provide for future health, education and retirement needs. The high savings result in a low marginal propensity to consume at 37 % of household income (compared to an average of more than 50 % of household income in more developed-market economies). The low marginal propensity to consume and the associated high savings rate have received significant attention in domestic and international policy circles and are viewed as a key barrier to China’s continuing road to development.
Table 1: Gini Coefficient and Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) for Low-Income Households in China (1988-2014)
Table 2: Income, Tax Payments, and Marginal Propensity to Save (MPS) for Low and High-Income Groups in China
Define the term Market-oriented policies.
List two factors contributing to income inequality in China.
Using information from Table 1, calculate the percentage increase in the Gini coefficient between 1988 and 2014.
Draw a diagram to show the relationship between income inequality and the Gini coefficient.
Using a market failure diagram, explain how public sector inefficiencies and corruption contribute to the under-provision of merit goods like healthcare and pensions.
Using a fiscal policy diagram, explain how government expenditure in China impacts inequality and economic growth.
Using a consumption and savings behavior diagram, explain the impact of a high marginal propensity to save (MPS) among low-income households on domestic demand.
Using Table 1, explain the difference in marginal propensity to consume (MPC) between China and developed-market economies.
Using information from the case study and your knowledge of income distribution and taxation, evaluate the impact of China's taxation system on income inequality and the efficiency of the economy.
Dominica is a small island nation in the Eastern Caribbean, with a population of approximately 72 000 people. Known as the “Nature Isle of the Caribbean,” its economy depends heavily on ecotourism, banana exports, and foreign investment. Having experienced significant hurricane damage in recent years (notably Hurricane Maria in 2017), Dominica has been focusing on rebuilding infrastructure, encouraging sustainable agriculture, and diversifying tourism activities to boost economic resilience.
In 2021, tourism made up around 25 % of GDP while bananas continued to be a key export crop. The government has been working to modernize the banana industry by providing subsidies for more climate-resilient farming methods, hoping to maintain Dominica’s main export market in the region. However, fluctuations in global banana prices have affected farmers’ incomes.
Dominica’s tax system includes corporate tax at 25 %, a progressive personal income tax with top rates close to 35 %, and a value-added tax (VAT) of 15 % on most goods and services (some basic food items are zero-rated). Small firms often struggle with compliance, contributing to lower-than-expected government tax revenues.
Dominica’s income distribution shows moderate inequality, which the government aims to address by expanding social safety nets and creating job-training programs. Nonetheless, the authorities have considered further policy measures to make growth more inclusive and resilient.
Below are three tables containing recent data useful for understanding economic performance and key markets in Dominica.
Table 1: Macroeconomic Indicators for Dominica (2018–2021)
| Year | Real GDP (EC$ millions) | Population | Unemployment Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 480 | 71 000 | 21.0 |
| 2019 | 495 | 71 200 | 20.5 |
| 2020 | 500 | 71 300 | 22.0 |
| 2021 | 520 | 71 500 | 20.0 |
Table 2: Banana Market Data (2021)
| Price per kg (EC$) | Quantity Demanded (tonnes) | Quantity Supplied (tonnes) |
|---|---|---|
| 1.00 | 14 000 | 10 000 |
| 1.50 | 12 000 | 12 000 |
| 2.00 | 10 000 | 15 000 |
Table 3: Income Distribution, Taxation, and Other Indicators (2021)
| Gini Coefficient | Progressive Tax Rates (personal) | Corporate Tax Rate | VAT Rate | Average MPC (estimated) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.42 | 15 %–35 % | 25 % | 15 % | 0.80 |
Using the information in Table 1, calculate the approximate percentage change in real GDP for Dominica from 2020 to 2021.
Assume that the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) in Dominica is as shown in Table 3. Using the formula for the Keynesian multiplier, calculate the total change in real GDP if the government injects an additional EC$10 million into public infrastructure spending.
Referring to the data in Table 2, calculate the price elasticity of demand (PED) for bananas in Dominica when the price increases from EC1.50 per kg.
Again using Table 2, calculate the surplus or shortage in the banana market at a price of EC$2.00 per kg.
Define the term “progressive tax.” [
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how a rise in ecotourism arrivals might affect real GDP and the price level in Dominica in the short run.
Using information from Table 1, calculate Dominica's real GDP per capita in 2021. Show your working.
Using the information from Table 3, explain two ways in which moderate income inequality could act as a constraint on Dominica’s long-term economic development.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend a policy that the government of Dominica could implement to reduce unemployment while maintaining growth and resilience in the economy. Support your recommendation with appropriate economic theory.
Thailand is an upper-middle-income country in Southeast Asia with a population of approximately 69.8 million. Historically, the Thai economy has relied heavily on exports, tourism, and agriculture. Tourism directly contributed around 12% of GDP in 2019; however, following global economic challenges, this contribution fell to an estimated 6% in 2020. The government forecasts economic recovery with modest improvements in various sectors including agriculture, manufacturing, and services.
Agriculture remains a key feature of Thailand’s economy, especially in rural provinces. Rice is Thailand’s most famous agricultural export, alongside rubber, sugar, and seafood products. Within Thailand, rubber has become a significant export earner, especially for the southern provinces. The government has looked for ways to diversify its economy beyond primary products and tourism, focusing on new manufacturing and digital industries.
In terms of macroeconomic indicators, Thailand experienced an average annual GDP growth of 4.2% between 2015 and 2019. Growth declined to -6.2% in 2020 due to the global pandemic, then recovered to 2.8% in 2021. Analysts predict growth of 3.5% in 2022 as industries continue to rebound.
Income inequality remains a challenge in Thailand. The Gini coefficient, while improved compared to previous decades, still indicates disparities in income distribution. Taxation remains an important tool for government revenue, largely comprised of value-added tax (VAT), corporate income tax, and personal income tax. Recently, various ministries have explored expanding progressive taxation to reduce income disparities and fund social programs.
To stimulate growth, Thailand’s government increased expenditures on infrastructure projects, particularly in transportation and digital connectivity. Economists suggest that with strong fiscal multipliers, government spending could have a multiplied effect on real GDP. However, critics argue that potential crowding out effects and inefficiencies in spending may undermine these positive impacts.
Below are several tables and figures with data related to Thailand’s economy.
TABLE 1: THAILAND’S RUBBER MARKET (2020–2021)
| Year | Average Price per kg (US$) | Quantity Demanded (million kg/year) |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 1.60 | 2,400 |
| 2021 | 1.76 | 2,200 |
Note: Values are approximations. Quantity demanded refers to global demand for Thai rubber.
TABLE 2: THAILAND’S MACROECONOMIC DATA (2019–2021)
| Year | Nominal GDP (billion US$) | GDP Deflator (index) | Population (million) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 543.5 | 100.0 | 69.5 |
| 2020 | 509.9 | 98.0 | 69.7 |
| 2021 | 524.7 | 99.5 | 69.8 |
Note: The GDP Deflator (2019=100) is used for calculating real GDP.
TABLE 3: TAXATION IN THAILAND (SELECTED RATES)
| Type of Tax | Rate of Tax |
|---|---|
| Corporate Income Tax | 20% |
| Personal Income Tax | Progressive tax up to 35% |
| Value-Added Tax (VAT) | Standard rate 7%; some at 0% |
TABLE 4: INCOME INEQUALITY AND GOVERNMENT SPENDING
| Indicator | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gini Coefficient | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.39 |
| Share of Income: Top 10% of Households | 28% | 28.5% | 28.7% |
| Share of Income: Bottom 40% of Households | 18% | 17.2% | 17.5% |
| Government Spending on Infrastructure (billion US$) | 15.2 | 17.0 | 20.0 |
Economists believe that every 1 US$ spent on infrastructure could lead to an additional 1.4 US$ in national income (Keynesian multiplier effect), but this remains debated among policymakers.
FIGURE 1: RICE SUPPLY AND WORLD DEMAND FOR THAI RICE (SIMPLIFIED)
Price (US$/ton)
|
P₁=400|------ S (Thai Rice)
| S
| S D (World)
| S---------------> Quantity
|____________________________________
In 2021, the average price of Thai rice was US$400 per ton, while world demand remained strong despite increased competition from Vietnam and India.
Using information from Table 1 (Thailand’s Rubber Market), calculate the price elasticity of demand (PED) for Thai rubber when the price changes from US1.76 per kg.
Using the data from Table 4, calculate the additional increase in national income (in US$) projected from the government’s 2021 infrastructure spending if the Keynesian multiplier effect is 1.4.
Using information from Table 2 (Thailand’s Macroeconomic Data), calculate Thailand’s real GDP for 2021. Show your workings.
Referencing Table 4 (Income Inequality and Government Spending), calculate the approximate difference in income share between the top 10% of households and the bottom 40% of households in 2021.
Define the term “Keynesian multiplier.”
Explain why reliance on primary commodities, such as rubber, may pose challenges for Thailand’s economic development.
Using information from Table 2, calculate the approximate percentage change in Thailand's nominal GDP between 2020 and 2021. Show your working.
Using information from the text and Figure 1 (Rice Supply and World Demand), explain the possible impact on Thai rice exports if the global price were to fall below US$400 per ton.
Using the text/data provided and knowledge of economics, recommend one policy that the government of Thailand could implement to reduce income inequality while supporting sustainable economic growth. Justify this recommendation.
Text A: The Coffee Market in Country Z
Country Z is a major producer of coffee beans, contributing significantly to its export revenues. However, due to a global oversupply of coffee, prices have fallen dramatically, impacting the incomes of local farmers. To support farmers, the government introduced a price floor above the equilibrium price. While this has stabilized farmer incomes, it has resulted in surplus production and increased government spending on storing unsold coffee.
In response to environmental concerns, Country Z has also introduced subsidies for farmers who adopt sustainable farming methods. Critics argue that while these measures aim to support farmers, they distort market efficiency and divert resources from other sectors of the economy.
Table 1: Coffee Production and Government Intervention
| Year | Market Price (US$ per kg) | Price Floor (US$ per kg) | Surplus Production (tonnes) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 3.5 | - | - |
| 2021 | 3.2 | 4.0 | 10,000 |
| 2022 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 15,500 |
| 2023 | 2.8 | 4.0 | 20,000 |
Text B: Regional Economic Cooperation in Country Y
Country Y recently joined a regional trade bloc that promotes free trade and economic integration. This has resulted in the removal of tariffs on agricultural and industrial goods traded within the bloc. The government hopes the trade bloc will help diversify the economy, currently reliant on exports of low-value-added agricultural products.
However, small-scale farmers in Country Y have struggled to compete with larger, more efficient producers from neighboring countries. To address this, the government is providing subsidies to small-scale farmers to improve productivity. Critics warn that the focus on agricultural subsidies may hinder the country’s transition to a more industrialized economy.
Table 2: Trade Performance in Country Y
| Year | Exports (US$ billion) | Imports (US$ billion) | Trade Balance (US$ billion) | GDP Growth Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 15.0 | 18.5 | -3.5 | 2.8 |
| 2020 | 16.2 | 20.1 | -3.9 | 3.1 |
| 2021 | 17.5 | 21.3 | -3.8 | 3.5 |
| 2022 | 19.8 | 23.6 | -3.8 | 4.2 |
Define the term price floor.
List two ways in which subsidies can impact market efficiency.
Using information from Table 1, calculate the increase in surplus production from 2021 to 2023.
Using a supply and demand diagram, illustrate the effect of the price floor on the coffee market in Country Z.
Using a market failure diagram, explain how the subsidy for sustainable farming in Country Z may lead to inefficiencies.
Using a market diagram, explain the impact of tariff removal on small-scale farmers in Country Y.
Using a comparative advantage diagram, explain how joining the trade bloc might help Country Y diversify its economy.
Using an AD-AS diagram, explain how the trade bloc membership could affect Country Y’s GDP growth.
Using information from the text/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate the impact of agricultural subsidies on economic growth and/or development in Country Y.
Practice 4.7 Sustainable Development with authentic IB Economics exam questions for both SL and HL students. This question bank mirrors Paper 1, 2, 3 structure, covering key topics like microeconomics, macroeconomics, and international trade. Get instant solutions, detailed explanations, and build exam confidence with questions in the style of IB examiners.
Over the past decade, Iceland’s economy has experienced both rapid growth and sudden declines. Tourism surged from fewer than 1 million visitors in 2012 to over 2 million visitors in 2019. However, fishing remains one of Iceland’s most significant export sectors, accounting for around 20% of national exports. The COVID-19 pandemic and associated travel restrictions led to a sharp decrease in tourism revenues and posed challenges for Iceland’s open economy.
Although Iceland has one of the lowest levels of income inequality among OECD countries, its policymakers remain vigilant about potential inequalities. Corporate and personal income taxes help fund a comprehensive social welfare system. Indirect taxes, such as a value-added tax (VAT) of 24%, also contribute significantly to government revenue. Recent exchange rate fluctuations have influenced the competitiveness of Icelandic fish products abroad.
Table 1: Real GDP in Iceland
| Year | Nominal GDP (ISK billions) | GDP Deflator (Base year 2017=100) |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2,600 | 100 |
| 2018 | 2,730 | 102 |
| 2019 | 2,800 | 105 |
| 2020 | 2,650 | 106 |
Table 2: Hypothetical Demand for Icelandic Cod Exports
| Price per kg (ISK) | Quantity Demanded (tonnes per month) |
|---|---|
| 800 | 15,000 |
| 840 | 14,200 |
Table 3: Income Distribution in Iceland (2020)
| Quintile | Share of National Income (%) |
|---|---|
| Lowest 20% | 10 |
| Second 20% | 14 |
| Third 20% | 19 |
| Fourth 20% | 24 |
| Highest 20% | 33 |
Figure 1 (not to scale) illustrates the growth in tourist arrivals in Iceland from 2017 to 2020:
• 2017: 2.2 million visitors
• 2018: 2.3 million visitors
• 2019: 2.0 million visitors
• 2020: 0.5 million visitors
Additionally, Iceland’s current corporate income tax rate is 20%. Personal income taxes range from 20% to 31%, depending on income brackets. VAT on goods such as tourism-related services is 11%, while it is 24% for most other goods. Policymakers in Iceland are debating how to sustain economic growth in the post-pandemic period by encouraging both a more diversified export sector and a stronger tourism industry.
Using the information provided in Table 1, calculate the real GDP for Iceland in 2020 (in ISK billions).
Suppose that an increase in government spending of ISK 30 billion led to an overall increase in real GDP of ISK 60 billion. Using the concept of the Keynesian multiplier, calculate the multiplier for Iceland.
Using the information from Table 2, calculate the price elasticity of demand (PED) when the price of cod increases from ISK 800 per kg to ISK 840 per kg.
If indirect tax revenue from VAT on various goods rises by ISK 8 billion as a result of higher consumption, calculate the total additional amount spent on these goods by consumers (assuming a uniform 24% VAT on those goods).
Define the term “income inequality.”
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how a significant decline in tourist arrivals (as shown in Figure 1) might affect Iceland’s real output and price level in the short run.
Using the income distribution data from Table 3, calculate the cumulative income share held by the bottom 60% of Icelandic households.
Using the information in the text and Table 3, explain two ways in which Iceland’s relatively low income inequality might support further economic development.
Using the text/data provided and knowledge of economics, recommend a policy that could be implemented by the Icelandic government in order to sustain economic growth while maintaining low inequality.
Nepal is a landlocked country in South Asia with a population of approximately 29.3 million people. Agriculture remains crucial, contributing about 27% of gross domestic product (GDP). Tourism and remittance inflows (estimated at around 24% of GDP) are also major components of Nepal’s economy. Nepal’s main trading partner is India, accounting for the largest share of both exports and imports. Nepal’s government applies a 13% Value Added Tax (VAT) on many goods and services, including coffee sales in the domestic market.
Table 1: Key Macroeconomic Indicators for Nepal (2019–2021)
| Year | Real GDP (billion NPR) | Real GDP growth (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 4000 | 7.0 |
| 2020 | 4160 | 4.0 |
| 2021 | 4290 | 3.5 |
Table 2: Labour Market Data for Nepal (2021)
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | 29,300,000 |
| Employed | 10,400,000 |
| Unemployed | 1,100,000 |
Table 3: Income Distribution (Nepal and Selected Countries)
| Country | Gini Coefficient | Proportion of Population below National Poverty Line (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Nepal | 0.33 | 18.7 |
| India | 0.35 | 21.9 |
| Bhutan | 0.38 | 8.2 |
Figure 1: Market for Nepali Coffee
Using the information from Table 1, calculate the average annual real GDP growth rate for Nepal over the period 2019–2021.
Using the data in Figure 1, and applying the midpoint method, calculate the price elasticity of demand for Nepali coffee when its price rises from 400 NPR/kg to 440 NPR/kg.
Using the information provided in Table 2, calculate the unemployment rate in Nepal for 2021.
From the information on VAT in the text above, calculate the total amount of VAT revenue the government collected from domestic coffee sales in 2022.
Define the term “Keynesian multiplier.”
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how a decrease in personal income tax could affect real GDP in Nepal.
A coffee shop in Nepal sells coffee worth 1,232,000 NPR in 2022. Given the 13% VAT mentioned in the case study, calculate the amount of VAT revenue included in this total.
Using information from Table 3, explain how income inequality could act as a barrier to economic development in Nepal.
Using the text/data provided and knowledge of economics, recommend one policy the government of Nepal could implement to reduce dependence on remittances and stimulate sustainable economic growth. Justify the recommendation.
Vietnam is one of the fastest-growing economies in Southeast Asia. Over the past two decades, it has transformed from a primarily agrarian society to a bustling hub for manufacturing and high-tech industries. Despite this rapid growth, Vietnam’s economy still depends heavily on primary commodities such as coffee and rice for foreign exchange earnings. Global coffee prices, fluctuations in supply, and shifts in consumer preferences affect Vietnam’s farmers and exporters significantly.
At the same time, Vietnam has made considerable progress in reducing poverty. Yet income inequality has been gradually rising, posing new challenges for policymakers. The government is also reviewing its tax policies and infrastructure expenditure. Part of the government’s long-term strategy includes upgrading road networks to facilitate trade and encouraging domestic firms to move into higher value-added segments.
Below are several tables presenting data on Vietnam’s coffee market, its macroeconomic performance, and its tax system.
Table 1: Vietnam’s Coffee Market
| Price (VND/kg) | Quantity Demanded (thousand tonnes/year) | Quantity Supplied (thousand tonnes/year) |
|---|---|---|
| 30,000 | 1,500 | 1,200 |
| 33,000 | 1,450 | 1,250 |
Table 2: Macroeconomic Indicators for Vietnam (2019–2022)
| Year | Real GDP (billions of US$, 2015 prices) | Population (millions) | Gini Coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 245 | 96 | 0.36 |
| 2020 | 252 | 97 | 0.37 |
| 2021 | 261 | 98 | 0.37 |
| 2022 | 275 | 99 | 0.38 |
Table 3: Vietnam’s Current Tax Rates
| Type of Tax | Rate |
|---|---|
| Corporate Income Tax | 20% |
| Personal Income Tax | Progressive up to 35% |
| Value-Added Tax (VAT) | Standard rate: 10% |
| (some goods at 5% or 0%) |
Recently, a domestic firm in Ho Chi Minh City purchased manufacturing equipment for 220,000 VND (the price paid, inclusive of VAT, at the standard 10% rate). Vietnam’s government has also announced major highway construction projects in the central and southern regions to improve the flow of goods and workers.
Meanwhile, economists note that an increase in the concentration of coffee exports in Vietnam’s revenue mix may expose the economy to volatility in global commodity prices. Measures to move into higher-value agricultural products, processing and branding, and improved farmer education are considered as long-term strategies to reduce reliance on primary commodities.
Using the information from Table 1, calculate the price elasticity of demand (PED) for coffee in Vietnam when the price increases from VND 30,000 per kg to VND 33,000 per kg. Show your working.
Using the data from the text and Table 3, calculate how much VAT (at the standard 10% rate) is contained in the purchase price of 220,000 VND for the manufacturing equipment. Show your working.
Using the data from Table 2, calculate Vietnam’s real GDP growth rate from 2021 to 2022. Show your working.
From Table 2, calculate the approximate real GDP per capita in 2022. Assume the population for 2022 is 99 million. Show your working.
Define the term “progressive tax.”
Explain why dependence on primary commodity exports (such as coffee) may pose challenges for a rapidly developing economy like Vietnam.
Using information from Table 2, calculate the percentage change in Vietnam's Gini coefficient between 2019 and 2022. Show your working.
With reference to the data in Table 2, explain how rising income inequality (as indicated by changes in the Gini coefficient) might affect Vietnam’s long-term economic growth.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend one policy that the government of Vietnam could implement to reduce its reliance on primary commodity exports (like coffee) while promoting sustainable economic development.
Ghana’s economy has experienced relatively high levels of economic growth over the past decade, largely driven by the export of primary commodities, such as cocoa and gold, and an expanding services sector. Ghana is one of the world’s largest exporters of cocoa, and cocoa alone contributes a significant share of the country’s export earnings. Despite these gains, Ghana has faced macroeconomic challenges in recent years, including rising inflation and fiscal deficits.
The government has attempted to diversify the economy away from its reliance on primary commodities, investing in infrastructure and seeking to encourage more value-added activities to boost productivity and employment. However, issues such as income inequality and limited access to finance in rural areas persist and may limit the potential for inclusive growth.
Below are some data tables about Ghana’s economy.
Table 1: Selected Macroeconomic Indicators for Ghana (2022)
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Nominal GDP (US$ billions) | 74 |
| Real GDP growth rate (%) | 3.7 |
| Inflation rate (%) (year-on-year, end of period) | 31 |
| Government expenditure (GH¢ billions) | 103 |
| Population (millions) | 31.4 |
| Gini coefficient | 0.43 |
Table 2: Cocoa Market Data (2022 estimates)
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Domestic demand for cocoa (tonnes) | 70 000 |
| Domestic cocoa price (GH¢ per tonne) | 10 000 |
| World cocoa price (GH¢ per tonne) | 11 000 |
| Quantity exported (tonnes) | 800 000 |
| Estimated price elasticity of demand (PED) | –0.5 |
| Estimated price elasticity of supply (PES) | +0.3 |
Table 3: Income Tax Rates in Ghana
| Tax Rate Bracket | Rate of Tax |
|---|---|
| 0 – GH¢ 3 828/year | 0 % |
| GH¢ 3 828 – GH¢ 20 000/year | 15 % |
| GH¢ 20 000 – GH¢ 40 000/year | 25 % |
| Above GH¢ 40 000/year | 30 % |
Additional information:
• The marginal propensity to consume (MPC) in Ghana is estimated at 0.8.
• Government tax revenue from cocoa exports is calculated as 10 % of the value of cocoa exported.
• The government aims to reduce inflation by tightening monetary policy and improving the efficiency of its tax collection system.
Using the information in Table 2, calculate the total tax revenue (in Ghana cedis) the government earns from cocoa exports.
Assume that the government injects an additional GH¢ 1 billion into infrastructure spending. Given that the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) in Ghana is 0.8, calculate the total change in real GDP resulting from this additional spending using the Keynesian multiplier formula.
Using the information in Table 1, calculate Ghana’s approximate GDP per capita in US dollars. Show your working.
From Table 2, using the estimated PES (+0.3), calculate the percentage change in quantity supplied of cocoa if its price rises from GH¢ 10 000 per tonne to GH¢ 11 000 per tonne in the domestic market.
Define the term “income inequality.”
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how tightening monetary policy could help reduce inflation in Ghana.
Using information from Table 2, calculate the total revenue (in GH¢) from domestic cocoa sales. Show your working.
With reference to the data in Table 1 and Table 3, explain two ways in which income tax policy could influence income distribution in Ghana.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend a policy that could be implemented by the government of Ghana to promote inclusive growth (i.e., reduce income inequality while sustaining economic growth). Justify your recommendation.
Indonesia’s Path to Economic Reform
Indonesia is undergoing a period of economic transformation, with ambitious reforms aimed at fostering long-term growth. The government has prioritized infrastructure expansion, streamlining regulations, and reducing corruption to attract investment. Additionally, tax incentives are being introduced to boost emerging industries such as transportation, telecommunications, metal production, and agricultural processing.
To fund infrastructure projects, which are projected to cost USD 22 billion, the government has reduced fuel subsidies, despite their role in making energy affordable for low-income households. While this move is expected to free up government funds, it has contributed to inflation, which has surged to 7.26%, exceeding the central bank’s target of 3–5%.
Indonesia’s economy also faces external challenges. Falling global prices of coal, gold, and palm oil, its major exports, have put downward pressure on export revenue. Meanwhile, economic growth has slowed, leading to declining consumer confidence. The Gini coefficient, which measures income inequality, has risen in recent years, reflecting concerns about income distribution.
To strengthen its economic foundation, the government is focusing on education and vocational training, aiming to reduce unemployment by upskilling its youthful workforce. Moreover, efforts to support small businesses include expanding access to micro-credit and making loans more accessible to entrepreneurs.
In response to economic pressures, Indonesia has also introduced trade protection measures, including tariffs and import restrictions, to shield domestic industries and encourage local production. However, critics argue that such policies may reduce efficiency and competitiveness in the long run.
Figure 1: Indonesian Development Statistics
| Year | Relative Poverty (% of population) | Absolute Poverty (millions) | Gini Coefficient | Human Development Index (HDI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 16.6 | 37 | 0.35 | -* |
| 2008 | 15.4 | 35 | 0.35 | 0.654 |
| 2009 | 14.2 | 33 | 0.37 | -* |
| 2010 | 13.3 | 31 | 0.38 | 0.671 |
| 2011 | 12.5 | 30 | 0.40 | 0.678 |
| 2012 | 11.7 | 29 | 0.41 | 0.681 |
| 2013 | 11.5 | 29 | 0.41 | 0.684 |
| 2014 | 11.0 | 28 | -* | -* |
Figure 2: Indonesia’s Economic Growth and Trade Statistics
| Year | GDP Growth (%) | Export Revenue (USD billion) | Trade Balance (USD billion) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 6.2 | 210 | 18.5 |
| 2011 | 6.5 | 230 | 15.2 |
| 2012 | 6.0 | 215 | 9.8 |
| 2013 | 5.8 | 200 | 3.4 |
| 2014 | 5.1 | 185 | -1.2 |
Define the term "inflation".
List two factors that may contribute to income inequality in an economy.
Using information from Figure 1, calculate the percentage decrease in absolute poverty between 2007 and 2014.
Draw a Lorenz curve diagram to illustrate the concept of income inequality in Indonesia.
Using a tariff diagram, explain how trade protection measures can support domestic industries.
Using an AD-AS diagram, explain how reducing fuel subsidies may affect Indonesia’s inflation rate.
Using a PPC diagram, explain how investment in education and vocational training can contribute to Indonesia’s long-term economic growth.
Using information from the text and your knowledge of economics, evaluate the Indonesia's current measures' effectiveness in achieving economic growth and development.
Austria is a landlocked country in Central Europe with a population of approximately 9 million. It has a high-income economy, diversified across manufacturing, services, and a thriving tourism sector. During 2022, tourism alone contributed about 15% of Austria’s gross domestic product (GDP), fueled by both winter sports and year-round cultural tourism.
Austria’s real GDP growth rate moderately improved between 2019 and 2022, assisted by strong consumer demand, increasing trade with neighboring economies (most notably Germany), and an expansionary fiscal stance. Government spending on infrastructure has grown, although policy makers closely watch any inflationary pressures that could arise from such fiscal expansion.
Despite relatively low inequality levels compared to many other developed nations, Austria’s Gini coefficient has inched upward from 0.26 a decade ago to around 0.28 in 2022. Debates on whether to reform personal income tax rates or strengthen social welfare programs have gained attention.
In terms of taxation, Austria uses a progressive personal income tax system with a top marginal rate of 55%. Corporate income taxes for resident firms currently stand at 25%, although there have been proposals to reduce this rate to 22%. To stimulate the economy further, the government allocated €5 billion in 2022 toward infrastructure projects, anticipating that the Keynesian multiplier would raise overall economic activity significantly.
Table 1 below shows simplified data on the Austrian ski package market, while Tables 2–4 provide additional macroeconomic and distribution information that will be referred to in the questions.
Table 1: The Market for Austrian Ski Packages (2021–2022)
| Year | Average Price per Package (EUR) | Quantity Demanded (millions) | Quantity Supplied (millions) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 900 | 4.0 | 3.8 |
| 2022 | 960 | 3.6 | 4.0 |
Table 2: Nominal GDP and Price Index in Austria (2019–2022)
| Year | Nominal GDP (billion EUR) | Price Index (2015=100) |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 390 | 104 |
| 2020 | 382 | 105 |
| 2021 | 400 | 106 |
| 2022 | 425 | 108 |
Table 3: Selected Economic Indicators (2022)
| Government Infrastructure Spending (billion EUR) | Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) | Proposed Corporate Tax Rate (%) | Current Personal Income Tax Rate (progressive, top rate) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 0.75 | 25 | 55% |
Table 4: Income Distribution Data in Austria (2022)
| Income Group | Average Annual Income (EUR) | Population Share (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Highest quintile (Q5) | 65,000 | 20 |
| Fourth quintile (Q4) | 50,000 | 20 |
| Third quintile (Q3) | 35,000 | 20 |
| Second quintile (Q2) | 25,000 | 20 |
| Lowest quintile (Q1) | 15,000 | 20 |
Using information from Table 1, calculate the price elasticity of demand (PED) for Austrian ski packages between 2021 and 2022.
Using the information in Table 3, calculate the total potential change in GDP if the government spends €5 billion on infrastructure and there is no crowding out.
Using data from Table 2, calculate Austria’s real GDP in 2022.
Using data from Table 1, calculate the price elasticity of supply (PES) for ski packages between 2021 and 2022.
Define the term “Keynesian multiplier.”
Explain why an economy that relies heavily on tourism might encounter risks to its macroeconomic stability.
Using information from Table 4, calculate the ratio of average annual income between the highest quintile (Q5) and lowest quintile (Q1). Show your working.
Using information from Table 4 (and the text above), explain how Austria’s relatively low Gini coefficient might influence its long-term economic growth and social outcomes.
Using the text/data provided and knowledge of economics, recommend one policy that the Austrian government could implement to diversify its economy beyond tourism while ensuring sustainable, long-term economic growth.
Inequality in China
As China’s economy first began to use market-oriented policies in the 1970s, it was famously suggested that some citizens, particularly through hard work, “should be allowed to get rich before others”. The government still plays a dominant role in the allocation of resources and benefits, keeping most of the gains for itself and its employees. Civil servants, who are assigned government housing, have benefited more and accumulated more wealth than the private sector employees.
Income inequality is a politically sensitive issue in China and the government has not reported on it for 26 years. In 1988, the Gini coefficient was 0.38 and the next set of figures released in 2014 give a value of 0.47.
According to research by the China Reform Foundation (CRF), “hidden income” amounts to more than US$1.4 trillion, or the equivalent of Australia’s annual gross domestic product (GDP). “Hidden incomes” refer to money gained from bribery or other corrupt behaviour, for example, bribes for officials or corrupt payments for doctors.
Low-income households are stuck with an outdated tax system that fails to address the inequality issue. They carry the burden of tax payments while the rich and powerful operate largely outside the tax system. Low-income households also have difficulty accessing credit.
Although the Chinese government expenditure is high, there tends to be inadequate spending on social protection programmes relating to health and old age. The lack of social protection has resulted in a high marginal propensity to save (MPS) amongst the low-income households as they put money away to provide for future health, education and retirement needs. The high savings result in a low marginal propensity to consume at 37 % of household income (compared to an average of more than 50 % of household income in more developed-market economies). The low marginal propensity to consume and the associated high savings rate have received significant attention in domestic and international policy circles and are viewed as a key barrier to China’s continuing road to development.
Table 1: Gini Coefficient and Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) for Low-Income Households in China (1988-2014)
Table 2: Income, Tax Payments, and Marginal Propensity to Save (MPS) for Low and High-Income Groups in China
Define the term Market-oriented policies.
List two factors contributing to income inequality in China.
Using information from Table 1, calculate the percentage increase in the Gini coefficient between 1988 and 2014.
Draw a diagram to show the relationship between income inequality and the Gini coefficient.
Using a market failure diagram, explain how public sector inefficiencies and corruption contribute to the under-provision of merit goods like healthcare and pensions.
Using a fiscal policy diagram, explain how government expenditure in China impacts inequality and economic growth.
Using a consumption and savings behavior diagram, explain the impact of a high marginal propensity to save (MPS) among low-income households on domestic demand.
Using Table 1, explain the difference in marginal propensity to consume (MPC) between China and developed-market economies.
Using information from the case study and your knowledge of income distribution and taxation, evaluate the impact of China's taxation system on income inequality and the efficiency of the economy.
Dominica is a small island nation in the Eastern Caribbean, with a population of approximately 72 000 people. Known as the “Nature Isle of the Caribbean,” its economy depends heavily on ecotourism, banana exports, and foreign investment. Having experienced significant hurricane damage in recent years (notably Hurricane Maria in 2017), Dominica has been focusing on rebuilding infrastructure, encouraging sustainable agriculture, and diversifying tourism activities to boost economic resilience.
In 2021, tourism made up around 25 % of GDP while bananas continued to be a key export crop. The government has been working to modernize the banana industry by providing subsidies for more climate-resilient farming methods, hoping to maintain Dominica’s main export market in the region. However, fluctuations in global banana prices have affected farmers’ incomes.
Dominica’s tax system includes corporate tax at 25 %, a progressive personal income tax with top rates close to 35 %, and a value-added tax (VAT) of 15 % on most goods and services (some basic food items are zero-rated). Small firms often struggle with compliance, contributing to lower-than-expected government tax revenues.
Dominica’s income distribution shows moderate inequality, which the government aims to address by expanding social safety nets and creating job-training programs. Nonetheless, the authorities have considered further policy measures to make growth more inclusive and resilient.
Below are three tables containing recent data useful for understanding economic performance and key markets in Dominica.
Table 1: Macroeconomic Indicators for Dominica (2018–2021)
| Year | Real GDP (EC$ millions) | Population | Unemployment Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 480 | 71 000 | 21.0 |
| 2019 | 495 | 71 200 | 20.5 |
| 2020 | 500 | 71 300 | 22.0 |
| 2021 | 520 | 71 500 | 20.0 |
Table 2: Banana Market Data (2021)
| Price per kg (EC$) | Quantity Demanded (tonnes) | Quantity Supplied (tonnes) |
|---|---|---|
| 1.00 | 14 000 | 10 000 |
| 1.50 | 12 000 | 12 000 |
| 2.00 | 10 000 | 15 000 |
Table 3: Income Distribution, Taxation, and Other Indicators (2021)
| Gini Coefficient | Progressive Tax Rates (personal) | Corporate Tax Rate | VAT Rate | Average MPC (estimated) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.42 | 15 %–35 % | 25 % | 15 % | 0.80 |
Using the information in Table 1, calculate the approximate percentage change in real GDP for Dominica from 2020 to 2021.
Assume that the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) in Dominica is as shown in Table 3. Using the formula for the Keynesian multiplier, calculate the total change in real GDP if the government injects an additional EC$10 million into public infrastructure spending.
Referring to the data in Table 2, calculate the price elasticity of demand (PED) for bananas in Dominica when the price increases from EC1.50 per kg.
Again using Table 2, calculate the surplus or shortage in the banana market at a price of EC$2.00 per kg.
Define the term “progressive tax.” [
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how a rise in ecotourism arrivals might affect real GDP and the price level in Dominica in the short run.
Using information from Table 1, calculate Dominica's real GDP per capita in 2021. Show your working.
Using the information from Table 3, explain two ways in which moderate income inequality could act as a constraint on Dominica’s long-term economic development.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend a policy that the government of Dominica could implement to reduce unemployment while maintaining growth and resilience in the economy. Support your recommendation with appropriate economic theory.
Thailand is an upper-middle-income country in Southeast Asia with a population of approximately 69.8 million. Historically, the Thai economy has relied heavily on exports, tourism, and agriculture. Tourism directly contributed around 12% of GDP in 2019; however, following global economic challenges, this contribution fell to an estimated 6% in 2020. The government forecasts economic recovery with modest improvements in various sectors including agriculture, manufacturing, and services.
Agriculture remains a key feature of Thailand’s economy, especially in rural provinces. Rice is Thailand’s most famous agricultural export, alongside rubber, sugar, and seafood products. Within Thailand, rubber has become a significant export earner, especially for the southern provinces. The government has looked for ways to diversify its economy beyond primary products and tourism, focusing on new manufacturing and digital industries.
In terms of macroeconomic indicators, Thailand experienced an average annual GDP growth of 4.2% between 2015 and 2019. Growth declined to -6.2% in 2020 due to the global pandemic, then recovered to 2.8% in 2021. Analysts predict growth of 3.5% in 2022 as industries continue to rebound.
Income inequality remains a challenge in Thailand. The Gini coefficient, while improved compared to previous decades, still indicates disparities in income distribution. Taxation remains an important tool for government revenue, largely comprised of value-added tax (VAT), corporate income tax, and personal income tax. Recently, various ministries have explored expanding progressive taxation to reduce income disparities and fund social programs.
To stimulate growth, Thailand’s government increased expenditures on infrastructure projects, particularly in transportation and digital connectivity. Economists suggest that with strong fiscal multipliers, government spending could have a multiplied effect on real GDP. However, critics argue that potential crowding out effects and inefficiencies in spending may undermine these positive impacts.
Below are several tables and figures with data related to Thailand’s economy.
TABLE 1: THAILAND’S RUBBER MARKET (2020–2021)
| Year | Average Price per kg (US$) | Quantity Demanded (million kg/year) |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 1.60 | 2,400 |
| 2021 | 1.76 | 2,200 |
Note: Values are approximations. Quantity demanded refers to global demand for Thai rubber.
TABLE 2: THAILAND’S MACROECONOMIC DATA (2019–2021)
| Year | Nominal GDP (billion US$) | GDP Deflator (index) | Population (million) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 543.5 | 100.0 | 69.5 |
| 2020 | 509.9 | 98.0 | 69.7 |
| 2021 | 524.7 | 99.5 | 69.8 |
Note: The GDP Deflator (2019=100) is used for calculating real GDP.
TABLE 3: TAXATION IN THAILAND (SELECTED RATES)
| Type of Tax | Rate of Tax |
|---|---|
| Corporate Income Tax | 20% |
| Personal Income Tax | Progressive tax up to 35% |
| Value-Added Tax (VAT) | Standard rate 7%; some at 0% |
TABLE 4: INCOME INEQUALITY AND GOVERNMENT SPENDING
| Indicator | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gini Coefficient | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.39 |
| Share of Income: Top 10% of Households | 28% | 28.5% | 28.7% |
| Share of Income: Bottom 40% of Households | 18% | 17.2% | 17.5% |
| Government Spending on Infrastructure (billion US$) | 15.2 | 17.0 | 20.0 |
Economists believe that every 1 US$ spent on infrastructure could lead to an additional 1.4 US$ in national income (Keynesian multiplier effect), but this remains debated among policymakers.
FIGURE 1: RICE SUPPLY AND WORLD DEMAND FOR THAI RICE (SIMPLIFIED)
Price (US$/ton)
|
P₁=400|------ S (Thai Rice)
| S
| S D (World)
| S---------------> Quantity
|____________________________________
In 2021, the average price of Thai rice was US$400 per ton, while world demand remained strong despite increased competition from Vietnam and India.
Using information from Table 1 (Thailand’s Rubber Market), calculate the price elasticity of demand (PED) for Thai rubber when the price changes from US1.76 per kg.
Using the data from Table 4, calculate the additional increase in national income (in US$) projected from the government’s 2021 infrastructure spending if the Keynesian multiplier effect is 1.4.
Using information from Table 2 (Thailand’s Macroeconomic Data), calculate Thailand’s real GDP for 2021. Show your workings.
Referencing Table 4 (Income Inequality and Government Spending), calculate the approximate difference in income share between the top 10% of households and the bottom 40% of households in 2021.
Define the term “Keynesian multiplier.”
Explain why reliance on primary commodities, such as rubber, may pose challenges for Thailand’s economic development.
Using information from Table 2, calculate the approximate percentage change in Thailand's nominal GDP between 2020 and 2021. Show your working.
Using information from the text and Figure 1 (Rice Supply and World Demand), explain the possible impact on Thai rice exports if the global price were to fall below US$400 per ton.
Using the text/data provided and knowledge of economics, recommend one policy that the government of Thailand could implement to reduce income inequality while supporting sustainable economic growth. Justify this recommendation.
Text A: The Coffee Market in Country Z
Country Z is a major producer of coffee beans, contributing significantly to its export revenues. However, due to a global oversupply of coffee, prices have fallen dramatically, impacting the incomes of local farmers. To support farmers, the government introduced a price floor above the equilibrium price. While this has stabilized farmer incomes, it has resulted in surplus production and increased government spending on storing unsold coffee.
In response to environmental concerns, Country Z has also introduced subsidies for farmers who adopt sustainable farming methods. Critics argue that while these measures aim to support farmers, they distort market efficiency and divert resources from other sectors of the economy.
Table 1: Coffee Production and Government Intervention
| Year | Market Price (US$ per kg) | Price Floor (US$ per kg) | Surplus Production (tonnes) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 3.5 | - | - |
| 2021 | 3.2 | 4.0 | 10,000 |
| 2022 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 15,500 |
| 2023 | 2.8 | 4.0 | 20,000 |
Text B: Regional Economic Cooperation in Country Y
Country Y recently joined a regional trade bloc that promotes free trade and economic integration. This has resulted in the removal of tariffs on agricultural and industrial goods traded within the bloc. The government hopes the trade bloc will help diversify the economy, currently reliant on exports of low-value-added agricultural products.
However, small-scale farmers in Country Y have struggled to compete with larger, more efficient producers from neighboring countries. To address this, the government is providing subsidies to small-scale farmers to improve productivity. Critics warn that the focus on agricultural subsidies may hinder the country’s transition to a more industrialized economy.
Table 2: Trade Performance in Country Y
| Year | Exports (US$ billion) | Imports (US$ billion) | Trade Balance (US$ billion) | GDP Growth Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 15.0 | 18.5 | -3.5 | 2.8 |
| 2020 | 16.2 | 20.1 | -3.9 | 3.1 |
| 2021 | 17.5 | 21.3 | -3.8 | 3.5 |
| 2022 | 19.8 | 23.6 | -3.8 | 4.2 |
Define the term price floor.
List two ways in which subsidies can impact market efficiency.
Using information from Table 1, calculate the increase in surplus production from 2021 to 2023.
Using a supply and demand diagram, illustrate the effect of the price floor on the coffee market in Country Z.
Using a market failure diagram, explain how the subsidy for sustainable farming in Country Z may lead to inefficiencies.
Using a market diagram, explain the impact of tariff removal on small-scale farmers in Country Y.
Using a comparative advantage diagram, explain how joining the trade bloc might help Country Y diversify its economy.
Using an AD-AS diagram, explain how the trade bloc membership could affect Country Y’s GDP growth.
Using information from the text/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate the impact of agricultural subsidies on economic growth and/or development in Country Y.